I am pleased to share some observations from
Ethiopia. These observations were made in my own time including during a family
visit to Gondar.
1. I begin with rural development, an issues that is
important to me. There are noticeable fundamental social and economic changes
in rural areas. For example, the qebela (wedding) season (in the month
of February) has been effectively cancelled, because the government has
enforced a law prohibiting marrying girls or boys below the age of 18 (?). There are still weddings, but they happen
when people (adults) fall in love with each other and decided to marry. And
parents no longer feel responsible for the wedding of adults. My father-in law
helped me initiate a “discussion” on this issue while we were on the bus.
People said that they had moved on and were not feeling bad about abandoning
the qebela tradition. More important,
many farmers have realized that everything in the countryside has an economic
(monetary) value. For example, a farmer gets cash by selling stones (used to
build houses) on his/her land plot; in fact, demand for stones is high as small
town expand in size. My young nephew
got up in the morning, sought the help of his friends to carry maize ageda
(straw) on his family farm to the nearest town and sold the ageda for 51
Birr (this plus the 50 Birr I had given him would made him better off than his
urban cohorts). Cash crops such as fruits, garlic and onions are hot
commodities, thanks to the Sudanese market. If you sell five or six thousands
eucalyptus trees, you may be able to buy a mini-bus. Some people can afford to
buy television if they have access to electricity. When I tried to provoke a discussion among young people
(students), it was clear that they still remained obsessed with urban life plus
getting government jobs (after finishing school), but they also realized that
there were economic opportunities in rural areas. Of course, all households do
not have the same income earning capacity: some still rely on crop production
while others have planted valuable cash crops; some have land plots nearer to
springs and rivers and so they have an advantage to produce vegetable and other
cash crops during the dry season; some have re-invested their money on
themselves vs others who have spent it on drinking; and finally, there are
households headed by widowed and single women. But, overall, the state of rural
society is good, compared with urban areas where people have been affected by
the rising cost of living.
However, I was concerned that some farmers were
spending more time in the cities and spending their money on drinking. I heard
that there were times when they shot at each other on the streets. Here is then
a need for government intervention through tough penalties for unwanted
behaviour and educating people to use their newly acquired economic power for
developmental purposes, such as keeping money in the bank, building houses that
meet modern standards, eating three times a day, feeding children adequately,
purchasing sanitation material, investment in local economy, and so on.
Otherwise the money will continue to get into the hands of merchants, hence,
perpetuating historical rural-urban inequalities.
2. Meles Zenawi is perhaps at the highest time of
his political career. All the sensitivity about the length of his stay in power
is absolutely nonsense at time when Ethiopia needs effective national
leadership. The West has increased trade with China and I presume Americans
recently dropped human rights issues from their agenda (with China), all this
because Chinese communist leaders have been very successful in promoting
economic growth and technological innovation. This is a lesson for Prime
Minister Meles and other EPRDF leaders; they should simply focus on their work.
But they should also learn to turn their heads 320 degrees and examine what is
happening around them. They went to the 2005 election with “development agenda”
and did not do well. I am going to list examples of issues that can cause
political frustrations and EPRDF must appreciate my openness:
Awash International Bank (አዋሽ
ኢንተርናሽናል
ባንክ)= አዋሽ አለም
አቀፍ ባንክ
Agency (ኤጀንሲ) = ወኪል
Business and Construction
Bank (ቢዚነስና
ኮንስትራክሽን
ባንክ) =
የስራና ግንባታ ባንክ
Grocery (ግሮሰሪ)
= የምግብ መደብር
Salon (ሳሎን) = ጸጉር
ቤት
Mass media (ማስ
ሚዲያ) = ብዙሃን የዜና
ማሰራጫ
Press release (ፕረስ ሪሊዝ) =
መግለጫ
St. Mary University (?) (ሴንት ሜሪ
ዩኒቨርሲቲ) =
ቅድስት ማሪያም
ዩኒቨርሲቲ
Doing this is not
difficult unless there is some kind of conspiracy by the current political,
bureaucratic and commercial elites. Trust me, this can be a serious political
issue. EPRDF cannot afford to ignore it.
·
The
urban youth is not happy. There are complaints about lack of jobs and cost of
living. As I walk around downtown Gondar, not only was I surprised to
see a large number of teenagers – so much that I felt that I was the only older person walking on the
street – but I kept wondering how many of them were dissatisfied with the
status quo. The solution lies in the growth and expansion of the Ethiopian
economy, which creates jobs and secures livelihoods. But EPRDF has also some
work to do to reach out to the urban youth including expanding programs that
encourage volunteer work. Young people who do volunteer work will have a better
understanding of societal reality and will be less vulnerable to the influence
of negative politics. Moreover, the
flooding by teenagers of streets would encourage socially unwanted behaviour,
such as increased early sexual activities. One solution for this can be keeping
young people at home by developing TV and radio talk shows, dramas, sitcoms,
etc, that appeal to youth audience.
·
By choosing to work with younger generation, EPRDF
might have alienated the most influential members of society, elders. This was
evident from the elders who came to greet me. They feel totally abandoned. I
had found a similar trend when I did my dissertation research in 1996. It will
be worthy for Prime Minister Meles to go around the country, under a certain
theme such as “conversation with
elders”, to hold an honest and a sincere dialogue with elders. EPRDF needs
elders’ support.
These are examples of potential political issues. EPRDF leaders better turn their heads 320 degrees to identify and deal with important societal issues.
3. The government should oversee how things are
working in the foreign aid sector which mainly consists of international NGOs
and multilateral organizations. As a lucrative sector (good pay and
opportunities for professional training), the foreign aid sector could be
controlled by a network of elites which then denies others access to employment
and participation. I met elites who were very frustrated with a lack of access
to such opportunities. When I was in Gondar in 1996, the two NGOs that I
visited had brought their staff including guards and drivers from Addis Ababa.
And this is a problem everywhere. According to one global survey which I
believe was conducted by an organization called CIVICUS, NGO elites living in
capital cities often reap the benefits of international assistance. You will be
amazed how the international foreign aid sector has advanced in thinking, one
of the most important advancement being the idea that foreign aid programs must
promote local ownership. This means not only the conventional (otherwise
methodologically modified) local participation, but also the practice of hiring
people who have in-depth understandings of local social, cultural, economic and
environmental systems. Although international organizations in Ethiopia can try
their best to ensure equal opportunities by advertise job opening, the information
does not reach many regions. Without interfering in their decisions, the Ethiopian government
can provide international organizations with information and advice on
recruitment and hiring activities in project regions, such as helping to identify
qualified people in the regions and giving these people employment and contract
priorities. These people not only have superior knowledge of local project
environments, but they also take their responsibilities very seriously. Their
involvement in aid projects will make the work of international organizations
more relevant for Ethiopia’s development.
4. One
night, I sat down in my hotel room and began watching the Ethiopian television
evening news. Two reports covered Meles tour of Gondar. But six reports were
devoted to the President of Austria and his wife (who were visiting Addis). I
am not kidding! Six reporters reported on the activities (for one day) of a
symbolic president of Austria. There was nothing about burning social,
economic, political or environmental issues. This is not the end of my story.
After the news came the televised election debate, organized by the Ethiopian
television and Ethiopian Press Agency. So, the hosts would tell opposition
representatives to hurry up and do quick speeches (in two to three minutes).
Then came the turn of EPRDF officials (four or five of them), who appeared very
relaxed and took as much time as they wanted to make long rhetoric. The setting
did not provide and equal opportunity and I did not have a good impression of
that public debate. If I were to rate the performance of the Ethiopian
Television, I would give it a failing grade.
5. I heard good things about Bereket Simon including
his ability as an effective party (EPRDF) manager and strategist and his
increasing commitment to the development of Gondar. But Bereket is not a communications person. What EPRDF needs is
someone who can effectively communicate its policies, programs and what it has
achieved. You will be surprised to know that even junior civil servants, let
alone ordinary people, have little idea of what the government does and what it
has achieved. The fact of the matter is
that, historically, the Ethiopian Ministry of Information does nothing except
ensuring that the news always reflects the government’s version of events and
stories. It is time to dismantle this department and create an effective
communication strategy for the federal government. In Canada, for example, each federal government department has a
communication department headed by director general or even assistant deputy
ministry, thus, allowing each department to communicate its work to national
and international public. A similar approach will allow the Ethiopian
government to decentralize communication activities and do better public
relations work.
6. If you go to Gondar and return to Addis to find
hotels, restaurants, nightclubs, etc., full of people (spending hundreds or
thousands of Birr a night), you are very likely to wonder what exactly is
happening in Ethiopian society. And who are those people
drinking at Hilton or Sheraton? Good question! But I don’t think they are EPRDF
elites. In fact, when I went to the home of the MP from my area, I found his
living standard too modest.
7. EPRDF should allocate sufficient budget to allow
MPs keep in touch with their constituents. Allowing them to travel once a year
is not enough. I challenged the young MP from my area to post his address and
telephone number on big billboards on town entrances or along major rural
roads, so that people can contact him easily whenever they have problems with
the local bureaucracy. He liked the idea but appeared hesitant. This was not
only a new way of doing business (politics) in Ethiopia, but he also knew that
there would be resource issues.
8. Ethiopian opposition parties are faced with
challenges. The most important challenge is to establish their presence on the
ground (in regions, Woredas and Kebeles). They always complain about harassment
by the ruling party officials and my experience in Gondar suggests that this
can be true. EPRDF in no way controls
the behaviour of Woreda and Kebele officials across the country, who also
number in tens of thousands. But this is the only problem. The political environment
is the major problem. If the information I had is correct, opposition members
have been very passive, their activities confined to, say, sitting in cafes or
restaurants to speculate about unfolding political crisis, criticize government
or spread rumours of an insurgent group in lowland areas destroying a
government military garrison, all of which makes Woreda and Keble officials
angry. The fact of the matter is that opposition parties in Addis Ababa can
complain in public about harassment (hoping that EPRDF can be pressured to do
something about it), but EPRDF has a problem of controlling the behaviour of
its own federal bureaucracy, let alone telling Kebele and Woreda officials in
remote areas of Gondar, for example, to behave properly. The best way is all
parties to working together to create a positive political environment. If opposition members or supporters go
around Woreda offices and Kebeles during special occasions (New Year, for
example) to thank EPRDF officials for their hard work (many work hard) and say
good wishes, this will do a lot to
influence the political environment (positively). If you are in Gondar, Afar,
Gamballa or anywhere, you better adopt your own style of politics. Beyene
Petros, Lidetu Ayalew and others can yell at Meles Zenawi in the parliament. If
you imitate this (yell at Woreda officials), your will be in big trouble. You
may find my explanations here too elementary, but they are practical.
At the macro level, Ethiopian
opposition parties can better articulate democracy in the context of
development and not appear to be used by central elites to come back to
power. Previous political development
models concentrated power in the hands of a network of central elites who
engaged in competitions to serve self-interests. They destroyed the country. It
should be the responsibility of every sector of Ethiopian society to help
opposition parties build their organizational strengths and ensure that they
develop values and behaviours that are developmental.
Getachew Mequanent
Ottawa, Canada
March 2008