IT’S TIME FOR AP TO STOP
THE ONSLAUGHT OF TRUTH IN THE NAME OF JOURNALISM
___________________________________
Elshadai Relief & Development Association
Sep. 07, 2007
(elshadai@ethionet.et) It’s
to be recalled that – when Associated Press (AP) came up with its
baseless report that attempted to tarnish our noble effort to tackle the
problem of begging by falsely tying it to the millennium celebration (“Homeless
Ethiopians Moved Out of Capital”, Aug. 28, 2007) – we did
our best to strongly yet politely refute the unfounded story (“Putting
the Record Straight …” Aug. 31, 2007). We also contacted AP’s
Ethiopia Correspondent, Anita Powell, to enlighten her on the spirit and
purpose of our work – giving her the benefit of doubt that, after
all, she might have lacked enough information on the three-year project
with a long-term goal to help the poor and the marginalized.
However, from what we read in her latest reports (“Ethiopian
Stray Dogs …”, Sep. 04 and “Coptic millennium celebrations
fall flat …” Sep. 07), we can’t help but think
that AP’s lady in Addis is on the onslaught against truth mission
under the mantra of journalism. We would leave for others concerned to
disprove her stories that don’t hold water, but we feel compelled
to, once again, challenge her altered assertion that:
“… an announcement [has been made] by a government-backed
private organization that it would move thousands of homeless people from
the capital to the countryside ahead of the celebration …”
The AP correspondent seems to have learned a good lesson that she should
refrain from naming names when the story is unsubstantiated. She also
has changed the story on the background of her imaginary implementer from
the initial “a development group that receives government funding”
to the current “government–backed private organization”.
We have to admit here that this is indeed good editing, as it’d
be worse for the former to get involved in this type of alleged activity
than the latter. But the fact remains that there is no such entity –
be it a “development group” or “private” –
that “said” or “made an announcement” as claimed
by AP. If there were, it’d be expected of the international news
organization to specify its source as well as the date and place of announcement.
We can’t quite figure out as to why Ms. Powell has chosen to stay
the course in her overt misinformation campaign. May be everyday is a
slow news day for the AP correspondent who appears to be barricading herself
in Addis. If that’s the case, we would like to take Ms. Powell to
task by openly and publicly offering her the opportunity to make a trip
to regional rural areas where she would be able to see firsthand the thousands
of people who eagerly left the life of begging behind, and returned to
a meaningful and productive life months ago.
However, from what we have come to see in Ms. Powell’s reporting
and witnessed from her visit to our office, we doubt that old-fashioned,
hardcore, fact-based journalism appeals to her. What she, instead, seems
to be interested in is tabloid-like reporting that would appeal to emotions.
It’s really unfortunate that the AP correspondent could not overcome
her bias to see and feel the good and positive things happening all around
her at the dawn of the new Ethiopian millennium. But the seemingly young
Ms. Powell could indeed be from the school of journalism that subscribes
to the notion that only bad news is newsworthy. If so, this is perhaps
what is forcing her to create her own story if or when necessary. Or it’s
possible that she adheres to the “know your audience” principle.
After all, her audience in the West would likely expect to hear from journalists
like her on latest fashion from Paris; tennis from Wimbledon; suicide
bombing from Iraq and misery from Ethiopia. But we have news for her:
She may choose to close her eyes and mind, but Ethiopia is marching down
a path of development.
The other possible scenario is that the Ms. Powell could be allowing
herself to be used by special interests or people with a one-sided political
agenda. When our PR volunteer called the AP correspondent after her first
false report, she apprehensively went, “What do you wanna me to
do? I’m a results-oriented person. If there’s anything you
wanna me to do, just let me know!” But our volunteer ethically replied,
“It’s not my job to tell you what to do or what to write.
It’d be our job to refute your story, but I just called to let you
know that there are errors in your reporting”. Come to think of
it, perhaps there are others who would take advantage of Ms. Powell’s,
“What do you want me to do?” offer, and tell her what exactly
she should do.
Anyone who has dealt with us would know that – as an organization
that has been in the mission of helping the poor and the disadvantaged
for the last 18 years – we would much rather be discussing child
welfare and sustainable development. And we certainly do not wish to subscribe
to “conspiracy theory”. Nonetheless, after sadly noticing
Ms. Powell’s obsession with negative reporting and her onslaught
on the effort to help the poor and the homeless, we can’t help but
wonder if the lady might have her own personal agenda, after all.
To sum up, whatever Ms. Powell underlying reason may be, it’s high
time for her superiors at AP to put a cap on their correspondent’s
groundless reporting. Failing that, one can’t help but think that
the self-proclaimed “largest and oldest news organization in the
world” is degenerating into tabloid news network.
|