A Democratic Process Has to be Protected

(The Ethiopian Election from an Eritrean Perspective)

 

The loss of 26 lives on Wednesday’s violence in Addis Ababa  was a sad and regrettable event. Firstly, it was not an appropriate solution taken by the supporters of the opposition to take such measures rather than legal and peaceful means in claiming the election complaints. Secondly, even though the government has responsibility to maintain law and order (protect properties of the people), I think it would be better to use other means than  this sort of confrontation. This can certainly give the process of democratization undertaken a negative image.

 

On the eve of the third Ethiopian National Election, it is to be remembered that I wrote a short article in which I expressed my wish for the Ethiopian people to have a successful election day. I did not want nor found I appropriate time to write the desirable winning party from an Eritrean perspective at that time. Now , even though not officially,  the  election result is known. We can raise many questions from the Erirean side.

 

What does it mean this election to us? What impact will it have on Eritrea? How do we evaluate the result of the election? What can we learn from it?

 

Democracy is a relative term. There is no absolute democracy in our planet. Even the so called democratic countries are on  process to build a better democracy from time to time. Take for example the role of women and the equalities of minorities in the western world are not even half way achieved. They are struggling to build  better  democracy possibly they can.

 

Election: I myself have experience of at least 6 elections of different European countries in my exile life. These are supposed to be relatively the most democratic countries. But yet there are some times irregularities and even vote rigging at a time. But most of them tolerate these irregularities and respect the results rather than exposing them to the outside world. Even we saw what happened in the USA in the five years ago election between G. Bush and Al Gore.  America, the solo supper power and developed nation in the world experienced a serious election irregularity. Above all, don’t forget, in the west, mostly the richer the party which owns the mass media, the winner is. Look in the US, how many millions of dollars is spent for election campaign? May be less,  but the same in the other western countries too.

 

Now Ethiopia a vast land of 72 million people, 85-90% of them illiterate, with poor infrastructure and transportation facilities, where no democracy has taken place, how can one expect an election without any irregularity and shortcomings?

 

Just leaving the recent violence as incident and unfortunate spot, in my view, the EPRDF government has created an inclusive democratic sphere for the election. Unlike the PFDJ regime in Eritrea the ruling party recognized and allowed the participation of various parties in this election. There were about 36 parties which participated in this national election. Unlike in Eritrea, there is freedom of speech, press belief and assembly. Even the opposition parties were allowed to use 56% of the allocated time of using the state media. Unlike in most African countries, there were about 300 foreign independent observers. The Carter Center and the European Union observers have positively evaluated this election. As my compatriot Saleh AA Younis said in his last article, what we can say as Eritreans is that “‘Na akum yemaslena’ (we hope and wish to have what you have now)”. We have had a dream for 30 years. But we could not realize our dream.

 

Democracy protects the rights of people. But it must be protected itself. Democracy without the rule of law and centralism is anarchism. In order to protect our rights, we must protect it too.

 

The election results must be respected by all parties. As there is chance to win, there is also equal chance to lose. It is logic one party must win. At the same time one has to understand that democracy can not be achieved overnight. As I have already said, it is a process which does not have an end. The opposition parties have won now about one third of the total seats in the Ethiopian parliament. It is a big win. If they act rationally at this nation wide difficult juncture, it seems they are likely to win the majority seats in the next election. I think they have to see this election in this perspective. With a full responsibility and wise. Not to try to grasp power at once by any means.

 

I think the theory which says “taking political power by inciting public unrest during an election” which recently took place in the former Soviet States like George and Ukraine does not possibly work in Ethiopia, for two reasons:

a)      Unlike the regimes of the above mentioned states the present ruling party of Ethiopia was more democratic, transparent during the election and was positively evaluated by the west.

b)      Unlike the leaders of Georgia and the Ukraine the Ethiopian leadership is supported by the supper power countries like the Uk and USA..

Therefore, trying to use the wrong theory in the wrong place will result only a setback to the achieved democratic process so far.

 

Dear reader, my intention is not to side or support the ruling party as such, but as a matter of fact, I was following closely the election process. When the election just started, the opposition threatened it to boycott before the results were known. When they saw they won in Addis, they said: “the election was fair” and were ready to accept the result of it. When the ruling party began to gain more seats in the rural areas which is believed to be a strong hold of the ruling party, they began again complaining and blaming the ruling party.

 

The bottom line is,  for the interest of the nation, the opposition parties have now the responsibility to settle down the unrest created due to the election controversy. It is a fragile situation where no one can gain from this mess. Even the democratic sphere created by the ruling party can be changed into negative attitude.

 

How do we see as Eritreans this election? For the PFDJ regime and its thugs, this democratic election is not for their interest. Mr. Issayas does not want to see democracy working 50 kilometers away from his dictating palace. Nor is he interested in the sovereignty (boarder)  of the nation. He is only interested in his power. The rest is  just cover up.

 

As to the Eritrean people and the opposition (except few), our view towards the on going election is mixed. Mixed in a sense, in one hand, as victims of dictatorship, we want to see democracy working in Ethiopia, regardless who wins the election. On the other hand who wins this election is not only interesting to us , but is also a concerning issue. As a proverb in Tigrigna says:” ‘neday nay lbu yhalim’ “ (a poor dreams of his wish) of course we see the election results through the angle of our  national interest, not selfishly but in a way the two peoples can have a mutual interest.

 

When we hear clearly and loudly the Ethiopian opposition parties rejecting our rights, there is no reason that we cannot tell who supports our rights.  We cannot and shall not forget the political stand of the EPRDF government in our cause. Why did the ruling party recognize the rights of the Eritrean people? This  is an interesting question. Not because it does not want unity nor does it have national interest such as sea inlets and outlets. The TPLF earlier and the EPRDF later realized thoroughly in principle that the Eritrean people struggled for a half century for this right and there was no other alternative than endless bloodshed between the two peoples. So we Eritreans, except a few naïve, want the ruling party to win. So that at least we can have an opportunity to repair the damaged relationship between the two brotherly peoples. But we Eritreans must remove the dictatorship first. This is a must. Otherwise, there is no other way out of this mess.

 

The Ethiopian opposition parties did and do not see what the ruling party saw.  As some political scientist say: “Politics is one sided. There is no fairness in politics, because of national interest.”  They are just blind by national interest. They do not and did not see what the Eritrean people paid for a half century. From Haile Sellassie’s era  to the DERG , an Eritrean family (house) paid an average of 3 children for this right. Worse than that,  the opposition parties want to annex part of Eritrea, Assab, neglecting the rights of the people. If they claim to be democrats, why do they fail to recognize the Eritrean people’s right?

 

Finally, first and foremost, we Eritreans would like to see the unrest created due to the election controversy be settled down peacefully. It is a fragile situation. We want to see democracy working in Ethiopia. Directly or indirectly it has effect in us. And I personally believe the opposition can play a big role here. We can not deny that the residents of Addis are the supporters of the opposition parties. It is a historical challenge to the opposition in settling down this chaotic situation. Secondly, as I said it is good the EPRDF wins the majority and it is equally good for us that the opposition gets enough seats in the parliament so that a credible parliamentary democracy works in our neighbor too. However, we Eritreans have one tough home work. We have to dismantle the dictatorial regime in our country and install a democratic system in place, so that we can have a good relationship with our democratic neighbor.

 

 

Adhanom Fitiwi (from Holland)

Comments: fitiwi@planet.nl