|
|
Drought
in the Horn of Africa: The UN declares famine in Somalia
On Wednesday,
the UN Office for Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) formally declared
famine in two regions of Somalia, southern Bakool and Lower Shebelle,
and said it could quickly spread to the rest of the country. The
drought, a major cause of the problem, is unlikely to end before
December or January next year. Mark Bowden, UN Humanitarian
Coordinator for Somalia said immediate action was required. With
malnutrition rates reaching 50 percent in some areas, immediate
action was required to avoid famine spreading. “This is a time for
exceptional action”, Mr. Bowden said. In New York, UN
Secretary-General, Ban ki-Moon, made an urgent appeal to donors for
300 million dollars within the next two months. This he said was
what was needed for an immediate response to famine affected areas,
but he also said that the overall funding requirement for
humanitarian intervention in Somalia was 1.6 billion dollars. The UN
says some 3.7 million people in Somalia, about half the population,
were now in danger, and of these 2.8 million are in the conflict
ravaged south. Tens of thousands have already died across the
region, most of them children. The last time conditions were as bad
as this in Somalia was during the civil war in 1992 when hundreds of
thousands of Somalis died, and an international peacekeeping force
had to intervene to make sure food aid deliveries could reach those
in need.
Aid agencies have been unable to work in most of southern Somalia
since the beginning of 2010, and this has contributed significantly
to the crisis. Al-Shabaab was linked to a string of attacks on
foreign aid workers and journalists, and the World Food Program,
which has lost a total of 14 workers since 2008, pulled out of Al-Shabaab
controlled areas following further demands for cash payments for
safe passage for aid. It was only over the weekend, following Al-Shabaab’s
apparent lifting of a ban on international aid in areas they control
that UNICEF was able to make the first airlift of food and medicine
to malnourished children in the Al-Shabaab controlled town of Baidoa.
UNICEF said its workers had been given unhindered access, and hoped
this would encourage other agencies. However, the UK which has
pledged £52.25m ($84m) in emergency drought aid to the region, has
said it will not deal with Al-Shabaab. The UK’s Overseas Aid
Minister, Andrew Mitchell, has been touring the huge Dadaab camp in
north-eastern Kenya which currently hosts around 400,000 refugees,
over three times as many as intended. Some 1,400 Somali refugees are
arriving every day at the overcrowded camp - some walking up to 20
days to get there. Mr. Mitchell said more than 3,000 people every
day were crossing into Ethiopia and Kenya, many of them arriving
with starving children: "We need everyone who can help from across
the world now to make sure they focus on this developing crisis here
to stop it becoming a catastrophe. There is an emergency developing
of profound proportions." He said that the UK “will not allow
operations to be fettered by [Al-Shabaab]; we must be able to see
that [our aid] can actually reach, with lifesaving
provision,
those for whom it is intended, and then we will be giving additional
support inside Somalia…".
Over the
weekend, Somali President, Sheikh Sharif, also declared Somalia to
be suffering from famine, and called for more international help.
According to Abdikadir Hersi, a member of the government’s drought
committee, 11,000 people have died in the last six weeks, most of
them in the Bay, Bakool and Lower Shebelle regions. According to
government sources, over 10,000 families from these drought-stricken
areas had moved to Mogadishu. The government was doing its best but
the “problem is beyond its capacity”.
That situation
may be eased shortly, as following “broad and inclusive
consultations” with different Somali stakeholders inside and outside
the country, including the President and the Speaker of the
Parliament, the Prime Minister has finally made up his list of
eighteen ministers, using the four point five power sharing formula.
Each of the four main clans have four positions and two appointments
go to minority clans. The size of the Cabinet is similar to that of
the previous premier, Mohamed Abdullahi Farmajo. Unexpectedly, it
contains no members of the former cabinet, and only four of the
members are MPs which has led to suggestions that parliament may be
reluctant to approve the list.
The appointments
include three deputy prime ministers: Hussein Arab Ise (Gerhajis/Isaaq/Dir)
who is also Minister of Defense; MP Abdiwahab Ugas Hussein Ugas
Khalif (Absame/Ogaden/Darod) also Minister of Trade and Industry;
and Mohamed Mohamud Haji Ibrahim (Dabare/Digil and Mirifle) also
Minister of Foreign Affairs. The Minister of Interior and Security
is Abdisamad Ma’alim Mohamud Sheikh Hassan (Ayr/Haber Gidir/Hawiye),
the son of Ma'alim Mohamud, the Spiritual leader of Ahlu Sunna wal
Jama’a in Central Somalia. The Minister of Health, Dr. Abdiaziz
Sheikh Yusuf (Sure/Dir) is also from Ahlu Sunna. The Minster of
Federal and Constitutional Affairs and Reconciliation is Abdirahman
Hosh Jibril (Leylkase/Darod); and the Minister of Finance, Dr.
Abdinasir Mohamed Abdule (Marehan/Darod), who is from the USA.
******************
Top
|
|
Al-Shabaab leaders disagree over drought relief
Meanwhile
the drought and famine is having a considerable political impact
within the senior ranks of Al-Shabaab with not everybody prepared to
support lifting of the ban on operations of international aid
agencies. Al-Shabaab’s chief commander, Abu-Zubeyr “Godane” opposed
the move, apparently worried that NGOs might provide intelligence
for air strikes by US and France helicopters and drones. This view
is apparently shared by a number of the leaders of the foreign
fighters, the so-called “ Al-Qaeda operatives”. Others, including
Sheikh Muktar Robow “Abu-Mansoor”, Al-Shabaab’s second in command,
whose clan members are most affected by the drought, Sheikh Ali
Dhere, Al-Shabaab spokesperson and Fuad Shongole, head of Al-Shabaab’s
community mobilization and religious affairs department, strongly
pushed for allowing international aid agencies to operate. They
argued that this will help Al-Shabaab regain lost trust and
confidence in the drought-stricken communities
in the South Central areas under its
control. They have been encouraged in this by support from clan
elders.
Shortly after Al-Shabaab
announced that it would
allow aid
agencies to operate in areas under its control elders in
Bay and Bakool regions, two of the worst drought affected areas
Sheikh Muktar Robow to pull the Rahenweyn fighters out of Mogadishu
since Abu-Zubeyr “Godane” was opposing any re-engagement with aid
agencies. The elders accused “Godane” of betraying the local
communities of Bay and Bakool regions by denying them aid despite
their full support for Al-Shabaab. The elders claimed “Godane” did
not have the interest of the people at heart even though these were
the people most affected by the drought. A local elder in Baidoa,
who identified himself as Hasab Aliyow was quoted as saying they
would do anything to resist any condition that Al-Shabaab might try
to impose on aid organizations. “Those organizations operate in all
other regions of Somalia. It is not only us that have been affected
by the drought. Other communities are getting assistance in their
areas,” said Aliyow.
Sheikh Muktar listened to the
elders from his clan. Witnesses reported seeing Rahenweyn fighters (Robow’s
clan) moving out of Mogadishu on Tuesday and Wednesday last week,
and returning to Bay region, a stronghold of Al-Shabaab. It is a
region mainly inhabited by the Rahenweyn and other affiliated
minorities. It is from these areas from which the majority of people
have been moving into the severely
overcrowded
Kenyan refugee camps or those at Dolo in Ethiopia. Most
of the people fleeing the drought come either from the Rahenweyn or
other minority Somali clans in the south-west where Al-Shabaab has
been able to gain significant support. Most of the refugees now
reaching the Dadaab camps have been coming from Sakow, Ufurow,
Afmadow or Bardera, and their dialects clearly show to which clans
they belong.
“Godane” reluctantly
went along with the decision to allow aid into Baidoa in the face
of the pressure and insistence coming from Muktar Robow and his
allies and from the Rahenweyn, but insisted that this “painful
decision” of allowing international aid agencies to carry out aid
distribution should only be carried out strictly under monitored and
regulated procedures. A week after Al-Shabaab lifted its ban, a
UNICEF plane landed at Baidoa Airport. Shortly before its arrival,
“Godane” forces took control of the process away from the UNICEF
coordinators on the ground, organizing the off-loading of the food
and medicine from the aircraft and placing it all in storehouses in
Baidoa under their control. Sheikh Muktar, angered that the supplies
were not immediately being distributed, mobilized his forces to
seize them. A violent confrontation was only avoided by the
intervention of the commander of the foreign fighters, Abu-Mansoor
Al-Ameriki, who forced “Godane” and Sheikh Muktar to meet. After two
days of discussion failed to resolve the impasse, they were told to
wait for a decision from Al-Qaeda, and until that came Sheikh Muktar
was to pull his forces to the west of the town and “Godane” take his
to the east.
Aid organizations
have been making use of the disagreement between Al-Shabaab leaders
to mobilize local elders and members of the Diaspora community to
put pressure on Al-Shabaab to allow access to drought victims. A
number of aid agencies have negotiated agreements with clan elders
in various parts of Bay, Bakool and Juba regions to take relief
supplies into areas under the control of clans affiliated to Al-Shabaab
leaders. There have, however, been other incidents underlining the
fact that not everyone in Al-Shabaab is prepared to support the
operation of aid agencies. Last Friday,
Al-Shabaab fighters burnt a vehicle carrying aid medicine for
drought affected people in Gedo region. The same day another car
loaded with aid drugs has seized as it was heading towards
Garbaharey, a town controlled by pro-government forces. Yesterday,
an Al-Shabaab spokesman, Sheikh Ali Mohamoud Rage, claimed the UN
declaration of famine was “100% false and propaganda”. He agreed
there was drought but denied this had led to widespread hunger.
Sheikh Ali said Al-Shabaab would not allow certain banned
organizations to return and would continue to block previously
banned organizations.
*****************
Top
|
|
The
situation around the region
Somalia may be the
worst affected part of the Horn of Africa but it is not the only
area suffering. Overall, eastern Africa is experiencing the most
severe drought in several decades, with an estimated 11 million
people affected. North and north east Kenya, south and eastern
Ethiopia and Djibouti as well as parts of Somaliland have all been
affected in addition to the worst hit area, Somalia, which has also
been suffering from widespread conflict. Eritrea is also believed to
be suffering severely though its government has released no figures
nor given any indication that its people are facing problems. Aid
agencies, however, estimate it has been as seriously affected as
other parts of the region. The United Nations’ Food and Agricultural
Organization has called an emergency meeting in Rome next Monday to
discuss mobilizing aid for the region.
Large areas of south
and south east Ethiopia have been hit by the severe drought. The
government has appealed for nearly 400 million dollars for emergency
food assistance for those in need. According to the Ministry of
Agriculture some 4.5 million people are in need of emergency
humanitarian assistance; this is 40 percent higher than estimated at
the time of the original appeal in April when it became clear the
rains were failing again. The Disaster Pre-emergency and Response
Unit and the Ministry of Agriculture are jointly assisting the worse
hit areas, distributing food and special rations for malnourished
children. According to Ato Mitiku Kassa, the Minister of
Agriculture, a total of 380,000 metric tons will be needed to assist
all those affected, including an estimated 700,000 children under
five, as well as pregnant and lactating women. So far, Ethiopia has
received about 44 percent of the amount for which it appealed.
The situation remains
serious. In large parts of southern Oromiya Regional State, the most
recent rainy seasons, October-November and February-May, both failed
as they have in the Somali Regional State. There are predictions
that this year’s rains in October may also fail. A third of the
people in the Borana zone are currently getting some food
assistance, some under the government’s Productive Safety Net
Program, but the resources of the local Disaster Prevention and
Preparedness Agency Office are limited, and the numbers in need are
rising fast. In the Somali Regional State, the government has been
trucking in water to worst hit areas. This, however, is an extremely
expensive exercise. According to OCHA the operation to supply water
cost at least 11 million dollars between January and March alone.
The UN
Under-Secretary for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief
Coordinator, Baroness Amos, on a visit to the Somali Regional State
earlier this month, commended federal and regional governments’
efforts to mitigate the effects of the drought. She also referred to
the fact that needs were not limited to Ethiopians. There has been a
major influx of refugees from Somalia into Ethiopia in recent
months. According to the UN at least 55,000 new Somali refugees have
arrived since January at Dolo, on the border with Somalia, where the
UNHCR has set up a new camp to help them. Dolo has two long term
camps and the third has been opened to assist recent arrivals. It is
already crowded. Another is about to be opened to relieve the
pressure.
In Ethiopia alone the
number of Somali refugees has reached more than 160 thousand and the
number continues to rise. According to Ministry of Interior
statistics, Kenya is now hosting a total of 514,000 refugees from
Somalia. International NGOs involved in relief operations are
warning that more refugees will be crossing the borders of Somalia
to neighboring Kenya and Ethiopia. In light of the equally large
number of Ethiopians and Kenyans needing emergency food aid, the
overflow of refugees will certainly complicate aid operations. The
Kenyan authorities recently called on the UN agencies to consider,
the international community should now start to think in terms of
setting up aid operations within Somalia.
Serious
consideration should be given to this. The overflow of refugees to
parts of Ethiopia and Kenya which are already facing drought and are
themselves in need of emergency food aid creates a logistical
nightmare for the aid agencies and for the effort so the two
governments to provide aid. UN relief agencies are already
expressing concern that their capabilities are overstretched. The
long distance many have to travel to reach the camps is taking its
toll. The number of people who die on their way to the camps has
reached alarming levels. These are deaths that could be avoided by
setting up camps closer to the areas from which the refuges are
coming.
More importantly,
perhaps, there is now relative peace and stability in many areas of
Somalia. This means there is a much improved opportunity for
international relief agencies to carry out operations in large areas
of the country, irrespective of the attitudes of Al-Shabaab.
Equally, with Al-Shabaab in retreat in many areas, the relocation of
Nairobi-based organizations to Somalia has become quite possible.
IGAD has been calling on the UN and other agencies for some time to
relocate to parts of Somalia that have seen an improvement in
security. This would have several advantages. The relief this would
bring to the drought sufferers is obvious. It would also go a long
way to take off some of the pressure on neighboring countries.
Another advantage is that it would send a message that it is after
all possible for Somalia to have a semblance of stable
administration if the international community would harmonize its
efforts to support Somalis and a Somali government. The relocation
of these agencies would go a long way to boost the morale of those
who are fighting extremism in Somalia as well as deny extremists the
space that has enabled them to recruit thousands of desperate
youths. The relocation of UN and other agencies from Nairobi to
Somalia is long overdue.
*****************
Top
|
|
IGAD
views on Eritrea presented to the UN Security Council
On Tuesday,
Ethiopia’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Ato
Hailemariam, presented IGAD’s views on Eritrea at an “interactive
dialogue” between the UN Security Council and a number of parties
including Ethiopia, Somalia, Djibouti,Uganda and Kenya, all members
of IGAD and Eritrea.
The meeting occurred
because details of the Report of the Monitoring Group on Somalia,
due to be presented to the Security Council in the first week of
July, began to leak a couple of months ago. This is
a 400 page document which provides extensive and detailed evidence
of the efforts that Eritrea has been making to provide support for
anti-government extremists in Somalia, as well as efforts to
destabilize most of the other countries of the Horn of Africa.
Eritrea was disturbed because it became apparent that the
report would be confirming details of its involvement in a number of
incidents, and in particular the attempt to carry out a series of
bombings in Addis Ababa to disrupt the AU Summit last January. In an
attempt to pre-empt this and project an image of reasonability,
President Isaias asked Secretary General Ban ki-Moon for a meeting
with the Security Council. The suggested dates were between June 16
and June 24, prior to the circulation of the report. These dates
were not acceptable but it was agreed that a meeting could take
place on July 19th. The Security Council also accepted
the requests of other parties to participate. As a result
representatives from Kenya, Djibouti, Uganda and Somalia all
participated as well as Ethiopia in its capacity as chair of IGAD.
The meeting was notable for the unanimity of the IGAD members, who
demonstrated almost unparalleled agreement for a multi-national
regional organization in the exposition of their views on the
activities of Eritrea.
Eritrea has
persistently claimed its actions have been the result of frustration
with Ethiopia’s failure to implement demarcation of the disputed
border between the two countries. Its Permanent Representative to
the United Nations, Ambassador Araya Desta, made the same point
again on Tuesday. In other words, Eritrea was arguing that it had
been necessary to engage in repeated campaigns of reckless adventure
and violence, in defiance of international law, in order to persuade
the international community to pressure Ethiopia. It has simply
ignored all efforts to persuade it to behave normally.
In fact, as
Ato Hailemariam noted in his presentation,
Ethiopia has consistently made it clear it is prepared to live with
the regime in Asmara in spite of their differences. It has
repeatedly reiterated its desire to demarcate the border between
Ethiopia and Eritrea in accordance with the decision of the Boundary
Commission. Ethiopia has repeatedly said it wishes to resolve all
outstanding issues through dialogue. The Eritrean government,
however, equally persistently has refused to consider any such
peaceful resolution to its differences with Ethiopia. It has rather
preferred to try and “cause havoc” apparently hoping for the total
disintegration of the Ethiopian state.
The attempt to
disrupt the AU Summit in Addis Ababa in January through a widespread
bombing campaign was a clear example of this. Dozens of terrorists
were recruited and trained in Asmara before being sent to Addis
Ababa. Ethiopia has already shared the conclusive evidence of the
involvement of the External Intelligence Directorate of Eritrea in
this operation with members of the Security Council. But the
activities of this Directorate have not just been a threat aimed at
Ethiopia. The network that the External Intelligence Directorate of
Eritrea created extends from Mogadishu to Hargeisa, Khartoum to
Juba, and Nairobi to Kampala as well as into Djibouti and Ethiopia.
The plot to disrupt the AU Summit was conceived, designed, led and
executed by this Directorate. Eritrea’s Embassy in Nairobi has been
instrumental in supporting Eritrea’s campaign of terror, disbursing
60,000 dollars monthly to fund Al-Shabaab’s activities in Somalia
and elsewhere. Other activities have included a recent attempt to
infiltrate terrorist cells to Djibouti and last July’s bombings in
Kampala (given the code-name of “the Asmara retreat”) as well as the
evidence of the plan “to turn Addis Ababa into Baghdad”. In other
words there is a mass of specific, detailed and independent evidence
of a deliberate policy of destabilization and destruction being
carried out by the government of Eritrea against the members of
IGAD.
Ato Hailemariam
emphasized that there was no justification for such a policy. “A
government that has rejected all overtures for peace and rebuffed
countless efforts at quiet diplomacy to achieve peace cannot claim
to have been mistreated by anyone..” It was hardly surprising that
IGAD’s Executive Council (Ministerial) and Summit meetings on June
28th and July 4th recognized the
determination of the regime in Asmara to destabilize the region.
Djibouti, Uganda, Ethiopia and Kenya all produced hard evidence of
Eritrean activities. Eritrea’s reasons might be opaque, but the aims
were very clear – Eritrea has deliberately and intentionally tried
to wreak havoc in the Horn of Africa “by bankrolling, training and
generally sponsoring terrorists throughout the region”.
All
IGAD states were in complete agreement in demanding that Eritrea
should stop all attempts to terrorize the region and bring an
immediate end to all efforts to recruit, train or equip terrorist
groups. Eritrea’s approach has been very clear - shoot first and
talk later, if at all. IGAD was therefore now appealing to the
Security Council to act as the situation warrants. The challenge was
how to avoid any further deterioration of the situation, how to
avoid further attempts to undermine an admittedly fragile
neighborhood. Ato Hailemariam said IGAD’s hope was that the Security
Council should now act firmly and strongly. Eritrea must be told
there is a limit. It was time to strengthen the previous Security
Council resolutions and impose concrete economic sanctions to deny
the regime the resources it needs to continue its destabilization
and terrorist activities.
Ato
Hailemariam underlined that any sanctions must first and foremost be
framed in such a way to avoid affecting the average Eritrean.
Remittances must not be included in any sanctions regime. However,
controls could be imposed on the funds extracted from the Diaspora,
through the 2% tax on all incomes and enforced fund raising. This is
one of the regime’s main sources of income. The other is from the
profits expected shortly from new mining developments. These should
be subject to sanctions so the government would be unable to use
these funds for its destabilizing activities.
IGAD was
unanimous as the presentations by other parties present underlined.
Everybody agreed it was necessary to act, “to rein Eritrea in, to
put a stop to its reckless and violent efforts to destabilize the
region”. Eritrea was a major threat to regional peace and security
and this was why IGAD leaders had decided to speak together to the
Security Council. Ato Hailemariam stressed that “failure to act will
send a very wrong signal,” encouraging Eritrea to continue its
aggressive terrorist activities. It would be a slap in the face for
the peoples of the region, and would reverberate widely around the
region, with serious and lasting implications for peace and
security. He concluded by appealing to the Security Council to
support the unanimous view of the countries of the region on the
ways to avoid any descent into further turmoil. The Council should,
he said, give the region its full cooperation to achieve peace and
security. It had a responsibility to help.
*****************
Top
|
|
Ethiopia’s Report on Civil and Political
Rights presented in Geneva
Last week, Ethiopia
presented its initial and combined periodic reports in
implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights to the UN Human Rights Committee in Geneva. The report was
drawn up in June 2009 and in April this year the government gave
additional replies to questions raised. The Ethiopian delegation
comprised experts from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the
Permanent Mission of Ethiopia to the United Nations in Geneva, the
Ministry of Justice, the Federal Police and the Prisons
Administration.
The report was
presented by the head of the delegation Ambassador Fisseha Yimer,
Special Adviser to Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minster, and
Ethiopia’s former Ambassador to Geneva. This was the first such
report Ethiopia has presented under the Covenant and Ambassador
Fisseha explained the delay as a result of limited technical
capacity. He also took the opportunity to express the Ethiopian
government’s thanks to Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights (OHCHR) for its technical and financial assistance in the
preparation of the report. OHCHR’s assistance in fact has been
invaluable in the presentation of Ethiopia’s reports for several
international and regional human rights instruments, including the
Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (see
the following story). Last year Ethiopia was successfully assessed
for its human rights performance under the Universal Periodic Review
of the UN Human Rights Council. Most of the recommendations for
improvements made in the Review were accepted. The government, with
OHCHR support, then held a national consultation exercise with the
relevant national institutions and civil society organizations to
build up a national framework for implementation.
In preparing for
this report, the government adopted a similarly participatory and
transparent process, involving federal and regional government
organizations, the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission, civil society
organizations and academic institutions. The resultant report
provides detailed information on the relevant technical and legal
framework, and the implementation of the provisions of protection of
the Covenant relating to the right to life and protection from
torture, cruel and degrading treatment, guarantees from
discrimination for vulnerable and marginalized groups, measures to
deal with impunity and trial of those involved in human rights
violations, political participation and accountability.
In his presentation,
Ambassador Fisseha emphasized that Ethiopia’s constitution
recognized, and indeed incorporated, almost all the key human rights
and freedoms recognized by human rights instruments. It also
recognized the supremacy of these as sources of interpretation of
the provisions of the constitution relevant to the protection of
these freedoms. He noted the positive measures taken in recent
years, including the revised Federal Criminal Code (2004) as well as
several laws and instruments regulating the conduct of police and
prison administrators and the security forces, among them the
Federal Police Commission Proclamation (2003), the Federal
Prosecutor Administration Council of Minister’s Regulations (1998),
the Federal Wardens Administration Council of Ministers’ Regulations
(2007) and the Treatment of Federal Prisoners Council of Ministers’
Regulations (2007). There are in fact a number of mechanisms for
monitoring the activity of the conduct of law enforcement officials
as well as the Criminal Procedure Code.
Other bodies play an
important role in promoting law and justice, among them the Human
Rights Commission and the Ombudsman’s Office. The House of Peoples’
Representatives has recently passed a proclamation to allow the
Commission to set up offices in each regional state, and it is
currently doing so. There is regular assessment and evaluation of
law enforcement officials to ensure proper implementation of codes
of conduct and the relevant legislation. Failure do so has led to
many documented instances of dismissal. Ethiopia has an extensive
human rights education program, and the 2007 report of the
Independent Expert on Minority Issues acknowledged this as both
comprehensive and exemplary. Indeed, the core tenets of human rights
are now learnt in primary school – and the current enrolment rate is
well over 90 percent! Training is also carried out by the Federal
Judicial Training Institute and the Ministry of Defense.
The government has
encouraged independent enquiries of incidents of violations of human
rights, including the conflict in Gambella (after which several
members of the defense forces were tried and convicted) and the
post-2005 election violence, which cleared the police of using
excessive force. The government arranged for the African Commission
on Human and Peoples’ Rights and others to carry out an independent
monitoring of prison administrations. The 2004 report of the Special
Rapporteur on Prison Conditions in Africa led to further reforms.
Members of the international community, the Human Rights Commission
and various CSOs have looked into some the allegations of torture in
Oromiya and Somali Regional States, finding them unsubstantiated. In
2007, the Human Rights Council dismissed a number of such claims of
human rights violations, including torture, in the Ogaden region of
the Somali Regional State. An independent investigation into further
allegations about the Ogaden a year later also found most of the
allegations had originated with an Eritrean-based armed opposition
group which has admitted carrying out numerous terrorist activities,
and which has indeed now been declared a terrorist organization.
Ambassador Fisseha noted that government’s approach to tackling
terrorism was in full compliance with international norms and
standards.
A number of external
political bodies, including the African Rights Monitor, the Human
Rights League of the Horn of Africa and the Oromo Support Group and
international NGOs made submissions to the Committee. Most of the
questions and points raised, which included inter alia
details about the constitutional and legal framework for
implementation of the Covenant, counter-terrorist measures,
discrimination and violence against women, the death penalty,
torture and treatment of prisoners and freedom of expression, were
covered in the report or answered in the replies given to the
Committee in April. Following the presentation of the report, there
was a dialogue between the Committee and the Ethiopian delegation.
The Committee will issue its concluding observations and
recommendations in due course.
*****************
Top
|
|
Ethiopia presents its periodic report to UN’s
Anti-discrimination committee.
Meanwhile,
last week, the Minister for Women, Youth and Children’s Affairs, Ms.
Zenebu Tadesse, also presented Ethiopia’s combined sixth and seventh
periodic reports to the UN Committee on the Elimination of
Discrimination Against Women in new York. Ms. Zenebu told the
committee that the principles of equality and non-discrimination had
been incorporated in to the Constitution and they resonated across
the federal and regional state judiciaries. The revised Federal
Family Code and the new Criminal Code both contained string and
comprehensive measures to support women’s rights, including new
provisions penalizing trafficking in women or children and
establishing units to investigate and prosecute offenders. Ms.
Zenebu said a national committee of officials from her ministry, and
the ministries of Labor and Social Affairs, Foreign Affairs and
Education had been set up deal with this issue. She explained the
Charities and Societies Proclamation had reserved the government’s
right to engage exclusively with “endogenous” charities in gender
issues as foreign funding usually did more harm than good, often
failing to pursue a domestic agenda. Claims that the law had had a
negative impact on NGOs whether working on women’s rights issues or
others were unfounded. The government had been “exerting its utmost
efforts on eliminating discrimination against women in every
sector”. She pointed out that there were a growing number of women’s
groups now operating in the country. The delegation also pointed out
that more than 500 new civil societies had been registered during
the year as well as others re-registered.
In education, female
school enrolment had risen and the drop-out rate declined. Ethiopia
would meet the Millennium Development Goal in this sector by 2015.
There was improved access to family planning and to health services,
but Ms Zenebu acknowledged there was still along way to go before
Ethiopia realized the goal of “no mother shall die while giving
birth”. Various other initiatives had benefitted women including a
“leave no women behind” program which had trained over 150,000
entrepreneurs and promoted their businesses through credit schemes.
The committee’s
members thought more training and awareness-raising was needed in
respect of violence against women and asked about marriage by
abduction and the issue of consent of children of forced marriages.
The delegation noted that systematic allegations of rape and other
actions by Ethiopian troops, made by the Eritrean-based ONLF had
been thoroughly investigated by the government and found to be
unfounded. The Ethiopian Defense Forces were highly disciplined and
professional. The delegation stressed this was “not a blanket
denial” however. More than a hundred cases had been taken to court
and their perpetrators punished. More broadly, between 2001 and
2007, 3119 perpetrators had been prosecuted and 2,111 sentenced, but
these cases had nothing to do with the armed forces. . It also
pointed out that Ethiopia hosted refugees from Somalia, Eritrea and
Sudan, and emphasized that the government did not discriminate
between the refugees and Ethiopian citizens.
The delegation
pointed out that the Charities Proclamation prohibited Ethiopian
charities from receiving more than 10% of their funds from abroad.
The Ethiopian Women Lawyers Association had received most of its
funding from abroad and it had also been planning to participate in
activities forbidden under Article 14 of the Constitution. This was
why its funds had been frozen, but 10% of these would, however, be
released. On the differences between sharia, customary and
family law, the delegation said that when parties accepted sharia
they must sign a form to that effect, but all three systems
recognized three types of marriage: civil, customary and religious.
During questions,
the delegation noted that all major human rights instruments had
been translated into the federal working language, and between 2003
and 2008 a five year project had trained more than four thousand
judges, prosecutors and police offices, and others, on the nature
and applicability of human rights instruments. There have also been
other training programs.
*****************
Top
|
|
|
|